Britain Votes: The General Election of 2024 - A special edition of our Parliamentary Affairs journal

Journal

Britain Votes: The General Election of 2024 - A special edition of our Parliamentary Affairs journal

7 Dec 2025

The general election of 2024 was a record-breaking election. It was a contest that produced the highest swing in the post-war era, delivering a Labour landslide and reducing the Conservatives to their lowest ever level of parliamentary representation. This special edition of our journal, Parliamentary Affairs, explains how and why this remarkable electoral turnaround was achieved.

Britain Votes: The 2024 General Election brings together contributions from leading electoral scholars including Professor Sir John Curtice, Professor Tim Bale, Professor Eunice Goes, Professor Ailsa Henderson, Professor James Mitchell, Professor Justin Fisher, and Professor Philip Cowley. It is edited by Professor Alistair Clark, Dr Louise Thompson and Professor Stuart Wilks-Heeg.

A few chapters are free to read for a limited time below. You can purchase the book at all good bookshops or online from Oxford University Press.

The editors also discussed the book’s key findings on our podcast, which you can listen to below.

The best way to subscribe to our Parliamentary Affairs journal is through our Premium Membership offer.

Free to read chapters

A record-breaking election

Alistair Clark, Louise Thompson, and Stuart Wilks-Heeg (Editors)

A striking feature of the 2024 contest was the number of electoral records it established. Taken together, these paint a picture of remarkable volatility. The turnaround from an eighty-seat majority for one party to a majority of 174 for another was unprecedented. The 11% swing from the Conservatives to Labour is the highest in the post-war era. There were also far-reaching changes to the UK’s legal and institutional framework prior to the election and the election was also fought on a new set of constituency boundaries.

Read the editors’ introduction

The electoral system: All a question of geography

John Curtice

There is much to unpack about how Britain’s electoral system operated in 2024. Why did Labour secure well over 60% of the seats on barely more than one-third of the vote? How were the Liberal Democrats, hitherto the party that had lost out most and most often from the system, suddenly able to secure almost their proportionate share of the seats? And what are the implications of such an unprecedented outcome for the debate about electoral reform?

Read this chapter

Voices from the edge make breakthrough in British politics: The Greens, Reform UK, and independents

Lynn Bennie and Anders Widfeldt

In 2024 the two main parties received less than 60% of the vote for the first time since universal suffrage, and the spread of parliamentary seats amongst other parties was broader than ever before. Six independents, five Reform UK candidates and four Greens became MPs, contributing to this parliamentary diversity. Nigel Farage became an MP at the eighth attempt, the Greens quadrupled their seats, and the Labour party’s perceived position on the Israel-Hamas conflict cost it a handful of seats to independents.

Read this chapter

Party finance: Labour exploits its advantage

Justin Fisher

The 2024 general election took place in the context of important legislative change related to party finance, together with Labour’s growing popularity ultimately being reflected in significant growth in its income as the election approached. The combination of increased campaign spending limits and Labour’s relative success in fundraising in the months leading up to the election meant that Labour was better able to exploit its ability to raise income and spend accordingly in the election campaign. By way of contrast, both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats were financially far worse off than they had been in 2019.

Read this chapter

A time to take stock

Stuart Wilks-Heeg, Alistair Clark and Louise Thompson (Editors)

General elections provide an important health check for any democracy. There were five features of the 2024 election that should be seen as causes for concern:

the extent to which candidates suffered from intimidation during the election;
the fall in turnout by 7.5 points to 59.8%, the second lowest since 1945;
the disproportionality of the election result;
the increased volatility of UK general elections; and
the role and reliability of opinion polling in an increasingly complex electoral environment.

Read about the five causes of concern

Listen to the Britain Votes 2024 editors discuss the findings on our podcast

Listen on your favourite podcast app

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

All the chapters in the book

Introduction

A record-breaking election, Alistair Clark, Louise Thompson and Stuart Wilks-Heeg

The Results and Election Context

The results: How Britain voted in 2024, Hannah Bunting
The electoral system: All a question of geography, John Curtice

Political Parties

‘Come, Armageddon, come’: The Conservatives, Sam Power, Paul Webb, and Tim Bale
The Labour Party under Keir Starmer: Plotting the route to a shallow landslide, Eunice Goes
Yellow fever returns: The 2024 Liberal Democrat campaign, David Cutts and Andrew Russell
Voices from the edge make breakthrough in British politics: : The Greens, Reform UK, and independents, Lynn Bennie and Anders Widfeldt

Territorial Dimensions

Shifting sands: Sources of voter volatility in the 2024 UK General Election in Scotland, Ailsa Henderson and James Mitchell
The 2024 UK General Election in Wales, Jac M. Larner and Richard Wyn Jones
Northern Ireland: Sinn Féin completes a hat-trick, Jonathan Tonge and Stuart Wilks-Heeg

Campaign Themes

Party finance: Labour exploits its advantage, Justin Fisher
The first TikTok election? Social media, generative AI, and data-driven campaigning in the 2024 UK General Election, Filip Biały and Rachel Gibson
There may be trouble ahead: Women’s representation, voters, and issues in the 2024 election campaign, Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern
Ethnic minority voters and the 2024 General Election, Nicole S. Martin
Tax, trip-ups, and transgressions: Reporting the 2024 UK General Election, David Deacon, David Smith, and Dominic Wring
Breweries, bricklaying, and bungee jumping: Understanding the 2024 campaign trail, Alia Middleton and David Cutts
An inexperienced parliament, Philip Cowley

Conclusion

A time to take stock, Stuart Wilks-Heeg, Alistair Clark and Louise Thompson

Join the Hansard Society and get cutting-edge research on the Westminster Parliament and other legislatures in the UK and around the world, delivered to your door in print and online, from one of the world's leading political research journals.

Become a Premium member

Latest / Highlights

News / Who really decides Immigration Rules: Parliament or the Home Secretary? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 137

Who really controls immigration law when Ministers can rewrite key rules with minimal parliamentary scrutiny? Jonathan Featonby of the Refugee Council explains the Home Secretary’s far-reaching powers over Immigration Rules. We also discuss the Crime and Policing Bill, where amendments on AI and abortion highlight the challenges posed by rushed law-making and executive overreach. And we look ahead to the next phase of the assisted dying debate, as supporters in the House of Commons prepare for a renewed legislative push in the next parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 16-20 March 2026

The Defence Secretary, John Healey, will face questions from MPs. The Grenfell Tower (Memorial Expenditure) Bill and the Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill will be fast-tracked through all their Commons stages in a single day. MPs will debate online safety, an e-petition calling for automatic by-elections when MPs defect to another party, and the Conservative Party will choose the Opposition Day debate. The Justice Committee will hear from the Victims’ Commissioner on the Courts and Tribunals Bill, the Public Accounts Committee will question officials about the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, and experts will give evidence on the Representation of the People Bill. In the Lords, Peers will continue scrutiny of the Crime and Policing, Pensions Schemes, and Finance (No. 2) Bills. Lord Arbuthnot will ask about Fujitsu contributing to compensation in the Post Office Horizon case, and Peers will debate terrorism, abortion, AI, and assisted dying.

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS