The Assisted Dying Bill is a Private Member’s Bill (PMB). Although the legislative stages for PMBs are the same as for Government bills, the rules that apply are different, creating distinct procedural hurdles that PMBs must navigate. This online discussion featured a discussion between a panel of impartial experts about the parliamentary process affecting this Bill. If you were unable to join us for the live event, a recording is now being made available.
The live event took place between 6:00pm and 7:15pm on Tuesday 26 November 2024 Post-event recording will be available from 27 November 2024 (Tickets: £10)
You can still purchase a recording of this online discussion, which explored the intricacies of the parliamentary process behind the Assisted Dying Private Member’s Bill - properly called the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.
The speakers are:
Sir David Natzler, former Clerk of the House of Commons;
Dr Daniel Gover, Senior Lecturer in British Politics at Queen Mary University of London; and
Dr Ruth Fox, Director of the Hansard Society, who will chair the event.
If you were unable to join us for the live event, a recording is now being made available. You will have exclusive access to it for up to four weeks after the event took place to watch it at your convenience.
Tickets are £10 - all proceeds go to our 80th Anniversary Fundraising Appeal which helps support our educational work.
The event focused strictly on the parliamentary dynamics surrounding this Bill, rather than the merits or policy debates surrounding assisted dying.
In advance of the Second Reading debate on the Bill, our panel of experts explain what is likely to unfold and what procedural hurdles may affect the Bill’s progress. The event covered key issues, including:
How PMBs operate: Discover what typically happens during the Second Reading of PMBs on sitting Fridays, and how this differs from the treatment of Government bills. What role will speech limits, filibustering and closure motions play in the debate?
PMBs as a legislative tool: Are PMBs and free votes suitable vehicles for enacting the right to assisted dying? We will explore precedents and lessons from past bills.
Procedural challenges specific to this Bill: What hurdles does this Bill face, particularly given its subject matter?
Pathways and roadblocks if passed: If the Bill receives a Second Reading, what procedural factors could aid or hinder its journey?
Government involvement: Does the Government have responsibilities in relation to Private Members' Bills, even if they are maintaining an officially 'neutral' stance? What options does the Government have to allocate additional time for the Bill if it survives Second Reading? What other procedural changes may be needed? We will look at the legislative precedents for context.
House of Lords consideration: Should the Bill progress through the Commons, what might its journey in the House of Lords entail?
Through clear explanations and Q&A opportunities, you will gain a solid understanding of the procedural landscape that will shape the Assisted Dying Bill’s legislative journey.
Sir David Natzler was Clerk of the House of Commons from 2015 to 2019, after a career in the House of Commons service which began in the mid-1970s. As Clerk he combined the twin roles of head of the 2,500 strong House of Commons service and being the senior adviser to the Speaker and all members of the House on parliamentary practice and procedure and on the constitution. His time as Clerk covered two general elections and the EU referendum.
Dr Daniel Gover is a Lecturer in British Politics at Queen Mary University of London and a specialist in legislative studies. His research focuses on how parliamentary procedures impact policy outcomes, with a particular focus on Private Members’ Bills.
Dr Ruth Fox is Director of the Hansard Society and co-host of our weekly Parliament Matters podcast. She has written regularly about Private Members’ Bills and how they should be reformed. She has also given evidence to the House of Commons Procedure Committee on several occasions regarding reform of PMB procedures.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - the Bill and Explanatory Notes
David Natzler, What future for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill? (Constitution Unit, 4 November 2024)
Daniel Gover, Assisted dying bill enters Parliament – how likely is it to become law? (The Conversation, 16 October 2024)
Daniel Gover, How to improve parliamentary scrutiny of the assisted dying bill (The Constitution Unit, 26 November 2024)
Ruth Fox, Enhancing the role of backbench MPs: Proposals for reform of Private Members’ Bills (Hansard Society, 2011)
Hansard Society, Procedural guide to Private Members’ Bills
Purchase a recording - All proceeds go to our 80th Anniversary Fundraising Appeal which helps support our educational work.
The UK Spending Review outlines how Government funds will be allocated over several years. Unlike the Budget, which raises revenue, the Review decides how it is spent. But how is it approved? What role does Parliament play if it doesn’t vote on the Review itself? This blog explores how the Spending Review works, how it differs from the Budget, and how Parliament holds the Government to account through the Estimates process.
On Friday 13 June, the House of Commons will once again debate the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales. Specifically, it will hold a second day of Report Stage, during which the whole House will debate and vote on amendments. This briefing explains the structure of Report Stage, what happened on the first day of Report Stage, how amendments are selected and grouped, on which amendments a decision can still be taken, and the likely sequence of events this Friday, including whether a final vote will take place.
The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves MP, will deliver a statement on the Spending Review. MPs will resume Report Stage of the assisted dying bill and debate key legislation on football governance, mental health, and planning and infrastructure. Peers and MPs are expected to resolve their standoff over AI and copyright in the Data (Use and Access) Bill. The Commons Defence Committee will hear from the lead reviewers of the Strategic Defence Review, while a Lords Committee will examine the Chagos Archipelago sovereignty issue. The Hansard Society’s Director will give evidence to the Modernisation Committee about access to the House of Commons and its procedures.
In this episode, we explore why ministers keep bypassing Parliament to make major announcements to the media — and whether returning to the Despatch Box might help clarify their message. We unpack the Lords' uphill battle to protect creators’ rights in the Data Use and Access Bill, challenge claims that the Assisted Dying Bill lacks scrutiny, and examine early findings from a Speaker’s Conference on improving security for MPs, as threats and intimidation against politicians continue to rise. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.
Our evidence on treaty scrutiny has been published by the House of Lords International Agreements Committee. Our submission outlines the problems with the existing framework for treaty scrutiny and why legislative and cultural change are needed to improve Parliament's scrutiny role. Our evidence joins calls for a parliamentary consent vote for the most significant agreements, a stronger role for Parliament in shaping negotiating mandates and monitoring progress, and a sifting committee tasked with determining which agreements warrant the greatest scrutiny.
