Blog

What role does Parliament play in the Spending Review?

9 Jun 2025
Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP, The Chancellor of the Exchequer, 29 July 2024. Image credit: House of Commons
Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP, The Chancellor of the Exchequer, 29 July 2024. Image credit: House of Commons

The UK Spending Review outlines how Government funds will be allocated over several years. Unlike the Budget, which raises revenue, the Review decides how it is spent. But how is it approved? What role does Parliament play if it doesn’t vote on the Review itself? This blog explores how the Spending Review works, how it differs from the Budget, and how Parliament holds the Government to account through the Estimates process.

Dr Ruth Fox, Director , Hansard Society
,
Director , Hansard Society

Dr Ruth Fox

Dr Ruth Fox
Director , Hansard Society

Ruth is responsible for the strategic direction and performance of the Society and leads its research programme. She has appeared before more than a dozen parliamentary select committees and inquiries, and regularly contributes to a wide range of current affairs programmes on radio and television, commentating on parliamentary process and political reform.

In 2012 she served as adviser to the independent Commission on Political and Democratic Reform in Gibraltar, and in 2013 as an independent member of the Northern Ireland Assembly’s Committee Review Group. Prior to joining the Society in 2008, she was head of research and communications for a Labour MP and Minister and ran his general election campaigns in 2001 and 2005 in a key marginal constituency.

In 2004 she worked for Senator John Kerry’s presidential campaign in the battleground state of Florida. In 1999-2001 she worked as a Client Manager and historical adviser at the Public Record Office (now the National Archives), after being awarded a PhD in political history (on the electoral strategy and philosophy of the Liberal Party 1970-1983) from the University of Leeds, where she also taught Modern European History and Contemporary International Politics.

Get our latest research, insights and events delivered to your inbox

Subscribe to our newsletter

We will never share your data with any third-parties.

Share this and support our work

A Spending Review (SR) is the process by which the UK Government sets out its spending priorities and departmental budgets for the years ahead. Unlike the Budget, which is focused on raising money (primarily through taxation), the Spending Review is about how that money will be allocated across government departments and programmes.

The upcoming Spending Review will cover the financial years 2026-27 to 2028-29 for resource spending, and extends to 2029-30 for capital investment. It is a critical tool for shaping public services, setting out the Departmental Expenditure Limits (DELs) for each department. These DELs are divided into:

  • Resource DEL (RDEL): day-to-day running costs such as salaries, supplies, and administration; and

  • Capital DEL (CDEL): investment in assets like infrastructure, equipment, and buildings.

When the Chancellor presents the Spending Review, it is in the form of an oral statement to which no immediate parliamentary approval procedure is attached. Unlike the Budget – where MPs debate formal Budget resolutions over several days, which then form the basis for the Finance Bill – MPs can only question the Chancellor following her oral statement.

After the Chancellor’s statement, Select Committees and individual MPs may scrutinise the plans further using the usual parliamentary mechanisms of inquiries and evidence sessions, questions to ministers, adjournment or backbench debates, and so on.

However, the House of Commons will play a crucial role in approving the departmental expenditure plans through the Estimates cycle when the Government formally makes a request for the money each financial year.

Later this month the House of Commons will be asked to approve the Main Estimates for departmental spending in the current financial year, which will form the basis for this year’s Supply and Appropriation Bill. These Estimates were laid before Parliament on 15 May and will be debated and voted on by MPs on 24 and 25 June. They relate to funding decisions outlined in the Chancellor’s Budget Statement in October 2024 for the current financial year, preceding the Spending Review period.

The spending outlined in the Spending Review will thus emerge in next year’s Estimates process as set out below:

  • Vote on Account - likely in February 2026: the Government will seek approval of around 45% of departmental budgets before the start of the 2026-27 financial year on 1 April; and

  • Main Estimates – in late Spring/early Summer 2026: the Government will present the balance of the annual expenditure limits for each department. When approved, these Estimates will form the basis of the Supply and Appropriation Bill, which enshrines the spending in law.

The Hansard Society’s guide to how Parliament debates and approves Government spending provides more information on the Estimates process.

The Spending Review is not comprehensive. According to the House of Commons Library, it covers about 40% of total public expenditure. This includes planned spending that departments can control and negotiate in advance.

Excluded from the SR is Annually Managed Expenditure (AME) – spending that fluctuates with demand, which includes pensions, welfare benefits and debt interest payments.

Because this spending is inherently unpredictable, it is handled separately and reviewed annually.

The Budget is about taxation and raising revenue. It may include some spending measures, but its core function is to outline how money will be collected through taxation (known as “charges on the people”) or other measures to fund the Government’s spending plans.

The Spring Statement is an update on the state of the economy, including new forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). It addresses the economic outlook over the course of the Parliament and may set out the need for adjustments to future plans.

In contrast, the Spending Review focuses on dividing up the Government-wide total spending pot by department and determining how each department should then allocate their money to specific policies to address the Government’s ‘missions’, manifesto commitments and departmental objectives. The division of money is determined through a negotiation process led by Ministers and their departmental teams engaging directly with the Treasury.

In theory, the SR sets out firm spending limits for the agreed period. But in practice, these figures are not carved in stone. Political pressures, economic shocks, or national emergencies can lead to significant revisions.

Moreover, because AME (which makes up most of the spending) is not controlled by the Spending Review, a large portion of Government spending remains outside the SR’s scope, making spending deviations common.

No, it is not a constitutional or parliamentary requirement. The tradition of multi-year Spending Reviews was introduced by Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown in 1998. Since then, SRs have been held irregularly, often shaped by the political and economic climate. Recent reviews took place in 2010, 2013, 2015, 2019 and 2021.

That said, under the Charter for Budget Responsibility (which was updated by this Government in January 2025), the Government now commits to holding a Spending Review at least every two years, covering at least three financial years each time. This framework, backed by the National Audit Act 2011, will ensure a degree of regularity and parliamentary scrutiny of the plans.

News / Who really decides Immigration Rules: Parliament or the Home Secretary? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 137

Who really controls immigration law when Ministers can rewrite key rules with minimal parliamentary scrutiny? Jonathan Featonby of the Refugee Council explains the Home Secretary’s far-reaching powers over Immigration Rules. We also discuss the Crime and Policing Bill, where amendments on AI and abortion highlight the challenges posed by rushed law-making and executive overreach. And we look ahead to the next phase of the assisted dying debate, as supporters in the House of Commons prepare for a renewed legislative push in the next parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

20 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 16-20 March 2026

The Defence Secretary, John Healey, will face questions from MPs. The Grenfell Tower (Memorial Expenditure) Bill and the Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill will be fast-tracked through all their Commons stages in a single day. MPs will debate online safety, an e-petition calling for automatic by-elections when MPs defect to another party, and the Conservative Party will choose the Opposition Day debate. The Justice Committee will hear from the Victims’ Commissioner on the Courts and Tribunals Bill, the Public Accounts Committee will question officials about the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, and experts will give evidence on the Representation of the People Bill. In the Lords, Peers will continue scrutiny of the Crime and Policing, Pensions Schemes, and Finance (No. 2) Bills. Lord Arbuthnot will ask about Fujitsu contributing to compensation in the Post Office Horizon case, and Peers will debate terrorism, abortion, AI, and assisted dying.

15 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

13 Mar 2026
Read more

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

09 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

10 Mar 2026
Read more