The Ukrainian Parliament after four years of war

Events

The Ukrainian Parliament after four years of war - Dr Sarah Whitmore

24 Feb 2026

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. © Bluraz / Adobe Stock

On the fourth anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Dr Sarah Whitmore spoke to us about how the Ukrainian Parliament has functioned under wartime conditions.

6:00pm-7:30pm on Tuesday 24 February 2026 at the Houses of Parliament, Westminster

Sarah is renowned for her research on the Ukrainian legislature, since long before the Russian invasion brought the country to global attention. Her article for the Hansard Society shortly after the invasion in 2022, Finding grace under pressure?, was followed by another on the first anniversary, Ukraine’s Parliament: One year at war.

Sarah brought us up to date on how the Parliament of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, has operated in such extreme circumstances and with the further challenge of tackling corruption.

About our guest speaker

Dr Sarah Whitmore is Associate Professor in Politics at Oxford Brookes University. Long before Ukraine came to dominate the news, she was inspired to specialise in Ukrainian politics by her time living in Kyiv.

Sarah was an English teacher in the 1990s at School 254, Borshchahivka, Ukraine, at the Institute of Fisheries and the International Management Institute. She then completed her MA, PhD and ESRC postdoc at the Centre for Russian and East European Studies at the University of Birmingham. Sarah is the author of State-Building in Ukraine: The Ukrainian Parliament and of many peer-reviewed journal articles on Russian and Ukrainian parliamentary politics. She has provided consultancy on Ukrainian domestic politics for UK Government departments and the US Department of State, as well as commentary for a wide range of media. She has two current research projects: one with Professor Bettina Renz, University of Nottingham, on “What sort of military does Ukraine want and need?” (funded by the British Academy); and on how the Verkhovna Rada has been functioning during the full-scale invasion.

Latest / Highlights

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 13-16 April 2026

Ministerial Statements are expected on developments during the recess, particularly in the Middle East and on Russian submarine activity. The English Devolution Bill completes its final Lords stages, while legislative “ping-pong” continues on the Pension Schemes, Victims and Courts, Crime and Policing, and Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bills. MPs scrutinising the Courts and Tribunals Bill will examine proposals to restrict jury trials. In the Lords, two bills – on the Grenfell Tower Memorial and ministerial salaries – will be fast-tracked through all stages in a single day. MPs will debate SEND reform, statutory menstrual leave, children’s safeguarding, and accessibility in the House of Commons. The Lords will consider changes to Immigration Rules and access rights for departing hereditary peers. Chloe Mawson becomes the first woman to serve as Clerk of the Parliaments. And the Treasury Committee will hold an appointment hearing with the new chief executive of the Prudential Regulatory Authority.

News / Will key Government bills pass by the end of the parliamentary Session? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 138

With the King’s Speech set for 13 May, attention turns to the end of the current parliamentary Session and the frantic “wash-up” period before prorogation, likely in late April. We assess which Bills can still make it through in the remaining sitting days. With major Lords amendments on issues including revenge porn, social media access for under-16s, court transcripts and AI safety, Ministers face intense pressure and possible concessions. We also examine the political stakes around the Chagos Islands Bill and the stalled Hillsborough Law. The episode also answers listener questions on parliamentary procedure and reform, before exploring the sharp rise in Written Parliamentary Questions and what it means for effective scrutiny in Westminster. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

News / Who really decides Immigration Rules: Parliament or the Home Secretary? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 137

Who really controls immigration law when Ministers can rewrite key rules with minimal parliamentary scrutiny? Jonathan Featonby of the Refugee Council explains the Home Secretary’s far-reaching powers over Immigration Rules. We also discuss the Crime and Policing Bill, where amendments on AI and abortion highlight the challenges posed by rushed law-making and executive overreach. And we look ahead to the next phase of the assisted dying debate, as supporters in the House of Commons prepare for a renewed legislative push in the next parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

Submissions / Written Parliamentary Questions - Our evidence to the House of Commons Procedure Committee

The use of Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) is rising sharply. Since July 2024, MPs have tabled questions at unprecedented levels. By late 2025 MPs were tabling over 600 per sitting day, more than double the long-term average. WPQs are a cornerstone of parliamentary scrutiny, helping MPs obtain information, challenge government policy and put issues on the public record. But this surge raises important questions about how Parliament balances transparency and accountability with the practical limits of the system. The House of Commons Procedure Committee is now examining the issue and has just published our submission containing our latest data and analysis.

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS