The Ukrainian Parliament after four years of war

Events

The Ukrainian Parliament after four years of war - Dr Sarah Whitmore

24 Feb 2026

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. © Bluraz / Adobe Stock

On the fourth anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Dr Sarah Whitmore spoke to us about how the Ukrainian Parliament has functioned under wartime conditions.

6:00pm-7:30pm on Tuesday 24 February 2026 at the Houses of Parliament, Westminster

Sarah is renowned for her research on the Ukrainian legislature, since long before the Russian invasion brought the country to global attention. Her article for the Hansard Society shortly after the invasion in 2022, Finding grace under pressure?, was followed by another on the first anniversary, Ukraine’s Parliament: One year at war.

Sarah brought us up to date on how the Parliament of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, has operated in such extreme circumstances and with the further challenge of tackling corruption.

About our guest speaker

Dr Sarah Whitmore is Associate Professor in Politics at Oxford Brookes University. Long before Ukraine came to dominate the news, she was inspired to specialise in Ukrainian politics by her time living in Kyiv.

Sarah was an English teacher in the 1990s at School 254, Borshchahivka, Ukraine, at the Institute of Fisheries and the International Management Institute. She then completed her MA, PhD and ESRC postdoc at the Centre for Russian and East European Studies at the University of Birmingham. Sarah is the author of State-Building in Ukraine: The Ukrainian Parliament and of many peer-reviewed journal articles on Russian and Ukrainian parliamentary politics. She has provided consultancy on Ukrainian domestic politics for UK Government departments and the US Department of State, as well as commentary for a wide range of media. She has two current research projects: one with Professor Bettina Renz, University of Nottingham, on “What sort of military does Ukraine want and need?” (funded by the British Academy); and on how the Verkhovna Rada has been functioning during the full-scale invasion.

Latest / Highlights

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

Blog / The Backbench Business Committee 15 years on: Has it given backbench MPs a stronger voice in the House of Commons?

Fifteen years after its creation, the Backbench Business Committee has become an important mechanism through which MPs can secure debates and raise issues in the House of Commons. Drawing on new research analysing debate transcripts and interviews with MPs, Ministers and officials, this blogpost analyses the Committee’s impact on parliamentary agenda-setting and cross-party campaigning. It highlights how the Committee has transformed opportunities for backbenchers while identifying ongoing challenges around participation, transparency and the Committee’s potential role in representing backbench interests more broadly.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 9-13 March 2026

The Treasury Committee questions Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the OBR, and the IFS, on the Spring Forecast. The Chancellor also faces MPs’ oral questions. MPs will for the first time debate the legislation – the Courts and Tribunals Bill – that proposes to abolish jury trials. They will also consider proposed Government powers to restrict children’s access to social media, complete the final stages of the Bill to implement the Autumn Budget, and hold a debate to mark International Women’s Day. In the Lords, the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill returns for consideration of amendments. Peers also continue their scrutiny of the Crime and Policing, Victims and Courts, Tobacco and Vapes, and National Insurance Contributions Bills, while the assisted dying bill reaches its eleventh day in Committee.