Publications / Briefings

Back to Business: Opposition parties

3 Jul 2024
The opposition benches in the House of Commons, 22 May 2024. ©UK Parliament
The opposition benches in the House of Commons, 22 May 2024. ©UK Parliament

The opinion polls predict the General Election will result in a Labour Government with a big majority. They also suggest the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties may win a similar number of seats. How would this affect the functioning of the opposition in the House of Commons? What factors determine the identity of the Official Opposition and the second party of opposition? What rights do the Official Opposition have in the House of Commons?

Some polls suggest that the Conservative Party could be reduced to around 150 seats, others suggest it could be reduced to 80 seats or fewer. Some of the scenarios in which the Conservative Party performance is at the lower end of expectations also suggest that the Liberal Democrats could overtake the Conservatives to become the second or third largest party, but with a lower share of the national vote. Under some scenarios, the election result could be so distorted that Reform UK could conceivably be the second largest party by vote share, but at best secure only a handful of seats, while the Liberal Democrats could become the second largest party in terms of seats and therefore become the Official Opposition but rank only fourth in share of the national vote.

These scenarios will all give rise to criticism of the First-Past-the-Post electoral system and debate about the merits of electoral reform. But some of the scenarios may also give rise to questions about fairness in the sharing of the rights and privileges accorded to the opposition parties in the House of Commons.

Erskine May states that the party that has the right to be called the Official Opposition is “the largest minority party which is prepared, in the event of the resignation of the Government, to assume office.”[1]

The Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975 sets out the definition of the Leader of the Opposition: he or she is “in relation to either House of Parliament, that Member of that House who is for the time being the Leader in that House of the party in opposition to Her [sic] Majesty’s Government having the greatest numerical strength in the House of Commons.”[2]

In the event that it is unclear which is the largest minority party or who the leader of that party is, the Act states:

“If any doubt arises as to which is or was at any material time the party in opposition to Her [sic] Majesty’s Government having the greatest numerical strength in the House of Commons, or as to who is or was at any material time the leader in that House of such a party, the question shall be decided for the purposes of this Act by the Speaker of the House of Commons, and his decision, certified in writing under his hand, shall be final and conclusive.[3]

Exceptionally, if two parties were to secure the same number of seats in the House of Commons it would therefore be for the Speaker of the House to decide which of them should be accorded the status of the Official Opposition. After the number of seats won, the criterion relied on by the Speaker in reaching a determination, would most likely be each party’s share of the vote.

In a period of considerable political and electoral volatility it cannot be ruled out that the party accorded the status of Official Opposition might change during the course of the Parliament owing to deaths in office, defections, mergers, resignations or suspensions. In the event of a material change in the number of seats held by the opposition parties mid-Parliament, it would be for the Speaker to decide whether the rights and responsibilities of the Official Opposition should be transferred to another party. His decision would be guided by the statutory and parliamentary definitions of the term Official Opposition.

Nor can it be ruled out that the identity of the second-largest party in the Commons might also change during the course of the Parliament. However, the parliamentary definition in Standing Orders of the second-largest opposition party for the purpose of allocating Opposition Days explicitly states that it is the non-government party which “has the second largest number of members elected to the House as members of that party” (our italics for emphasis). As such a party which had more seats than any other opposition party other than the Official Opposition as a result of defections or a merger, would not secure the rights of the second party of opposition because its new MPs would not have been elected to the House as members of that party. There is precedent for such a scenario: when the Liberal Party and the Social Democratic Party merged in 1988 to form a new party - the Social and Liberal Democrats - they were the second largest opposition party in the House in terms of size, but the new party lost the entitlement to three Opposition Days previously held by the Liberal Party to the smaller Ulster Unionist Party.[4]

If the election result is particularly distorted, and especially if the opposition parties can muster little more than 150 seats between them, then it may be to their mutual advantage, liaising with the Speaker, to re-think the concept of how opposition is organised and resourced in a more collaborative direction.

The status of the Official Opposition and the role of Leader of the Opposition entail significant constitutional rights and responsibilities.

1. Question Time: At Prime Minister’s Question’s, the Leader of the Opposition may ask the Prime Minister up to six questions. In contrast, the leader of the second largest opposition party is usually only called upon to ask two questions. At departmental questions Opposition party spokespersons are usually permitted to ask a certain number of supplementary questions. Erskine May indicates that “members of the Shadow Cabinet and other Official Opposition spokespersons are also given some precedence in asking questions and in debate."[5]

2. Opposition Days: Under Standing Order No. 14(2), 20 days are allotted in each Session for debates on motions selected by opposition parties. Seventeen Opposition Days are at the disposal of the Official Opposition, while just three are awarded to the second largest opposition party.[6]

3. Amendments: Amendments to motions and bills tabled by the Official Opposition, and particularly by the Leader of the Opposition, are given priority in the selection of amendments by the Speaker.

4. Select Committees: While Standing Orders require the allocation of Select Committee chairs to reflect the party balance in the House, the chairs of both the Public Accounts Committee and the Standards Committee are reserved for MPs from the Official Opposition.

5. No-confidence motions: Any MP is entitled to table a motion of no confidence in the Government. However, if the Leader of the Opposition tables such a motion, then by convention the Government will make time available for that motion to be debated promptly. It is under no obligation to make such time available for any other party leader or individual MP.

6. Speech time limits: Under Standing Order No. 47, the Speaker can impose a time limit on backbench speeches.[7] That time limit does not apply to speeches made by Ministers, Shadow Ministers, or by “not more than one Member” representing the leader of the second largest opposition party.

The Speaker has also indicated that when Ministers make a Statement to the House, he expects their speech to take no longer than 10 minutes, with a similar expectation of five minutes for the Shadow Minister, and just two minutes for the spokesperson from the third party.[8] A similar convention applies to Urgent Questions (UQs), with a three-minute limit for the Minister’s response to the UQ, two minutes for the Shadow Minister, and one minute for the third-party spokesperson.

7. Short Money: Since 1975 opposition parties have received funding to support their parliamentary activities. The funding is available to all opposition parties that win either two seats, or one seat and more than 150,000 votes in the most recent General Election.

The funding has three components:

  1. General funding to support parliamentary business;

  2. Travel expenses; and

  3. Funding for the Leader of the Opposition’s office.

Parties largely use the general funds to provide research and policy support to their frontbench and to fund staff in the Whips’ and Leader of the Opposition's offices.

In 2023-24, the parties received £21,438.33 in Short Money for every seat they won in the most recent General Election, plus £42.82 for every 200 votes the party received.

A total of £235,511.46 to cover travel expenses is also divided proportionately among the parties in accordance with the same formula.

In addition to the general funding and travel expenses, a sum of £998,817.35 was made available to cover the costs of running the Leader of the Opposition’s Office.[9]

The per seat and per vote general funding, the travel expenses, and the funding for the Leader of the Opposition’s Office have since been uprated for 2024-25 in line with the Consumer Price Index in December 2023 (which was 4.0% according to the Office for National Statistics).[10]

[1] Erskine May’s treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament, 25th edition, 2019, para. 4.6

[4] Erskine May’s treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament, 25th edition, 2019, para. 18.13

[5] Erskine May’s treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament, 25th edition, 2019, para. 4.6

[6] Standing Order No.14(2), House of Commons Standing Orders for Public Business, as at 23 October 2023

[7] Standing Order No.47, House of Commons Standing Orders for Public Business, as at 23 October 2023

[8] House of Commons, Hansard, 18 May 2016, vol. 611, col. 1

[9] Kelly, R. (8 June 2023), House of Commons Library, Short Money

[10] Office for National Statistics, Consumer price inflation, UK: December 2023

©UK Parliament/Maria Unger

The new Parliament will assemble on Tuesday 9 July 2024, five days after the General Election. This guide explains the ceremonial, legislative, organisational and procedural processes that are engaged at the start of the Parliament. It examines the challenges a July General Election poses to the parliamentary calendar over the Summer and looks at the Government's plans with respect to legislation and public finances.

News / Will Parliament pay a price for promises to WASPI women? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 61

As Christmas approaches, Westminster eases into its pre-festive lull. Yet, a major political storm clouds the year’s end: the fallout from the Government’s decision not to compensate the WASPI women. This controversy highlights a recurring dilemma in politics—the risks of opposition parties over-promising and the inevitable backlash when those promises confront the harsh realities of governing. And as a seasonal stocking filler, Ruth and Mark talk to the authors of two fascinating books that uncover hidden aspects of parliamentary history.

20 Dec 2024
Read more

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What's coming up in Parliament this week? 16-20 December 2024

MPs will review five bills, including the Water (Special Measures) Bill, and debate two e-petitions on Israel and Palestine, including one on halting arms exports to Israel which may raise sub judice concerns. Six Select Committees will see membership changes following front bench reshuffles, and Peers will consider proposals for four new inquiry committees for 2025. The Defence Committee Chair will raise concerns about poor service accommodation, while Angela Rayner, Yvette Cooper, Shabana Mahmood, Wes Streeting and Michael Gove face Select Committees.

15 Dec 2024
Read more

Briefings / The Assisted Dying Bill: A guide to the Private Member's Bill process

This briefing explains what to watch for during the Second Reading debate of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on 29 November. It outlines the procedural and legislative issues that will come into play: the role of the Chair in managing the debate and how procedures such as the 'closure' and 'reasoned amendments' work. It looks ahead to the Committee and Report stage procedures that will apply if the Bill progresses beyond Second Reading. It also examines the government's responsibilities, such as providing a money resolution for the Bill and preparing an Impact Assessment, while addressing broader concerns about the adequacy of Private Members’ Bill procedures for scrutinising controversial issues.

27 Nov 2024
Read more

News / Licence to scrutinise: spooks, hereditary peers and assisted dying - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 60

In this week’s episode the ‘assisted dying’ bill takes centre stage as the newly chosen members of the Public Bill Committee gear up for detailed scrutiny of the legislation. With 23 members, including two ministers, this committee promises a mix of seasoned voices and first-time MPs debating a very difficult issue. We are joined by Hansard Society researcher, Matthew England, who breaks down the committee’s composition, party balance, and the strategic dynamics that will influence the bill’s trajectory.

13 Dec 2024
Read more

News / How a British student has schooled the US Congress - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 58

In this special episode, we dive into the fascinating world of US congressional procedure with Hansard Society member Kacper Surdy, the once-anonymous force behind the influential social media account @ringwiss. Despite being a 20-year-old Durham University student, Kacper has become a go-to authority on Capitol Hill’s intricate rules, earning the admiration of seasoned political insiders. With Donald Trump hinting at bypassing Senate norms to appoint controversial figures to his cabinet, Kacper unravels the high stakes procedural battles shaping Washington.

04 Dec 2024
Read more