News

Assisted dying bill: Special series #6 - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 79

7 Mar 2025

In this sixth instalment of our special mini-podcast series, we continue to track the progress of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which seeks to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales. This episode looks into developments in the Bill Committee this week, where scrutiny of the legislation has intensified. And we speak with Professor Colin Gavaghan about how New Zealand legislated for assisted dying.

In this episode, we track the latest developments in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill Committee, where scrutiny has intensified. We discuss the pace of the Committee’s progress, the dynamics between supporters and opponents of the Bill, and a key upcoming vote on the clause which proposes shifting oversight from High Court judges to an expert panel. Could this amendment sway MPs who previously supported the Bill?

Later, we turn to New Zealand, where assisted dying has been legal for over three years. Professor Colin Gavaghan, from the University of Bristol, shares insights into New Zealand’s experience, exploring eligibility criteria, operational challenges, and the emotional toll on medical professionals. What lessons can the UK learn from their legislative approach and the assisted dying system itself.

Professor Colin Gavaghan. ©

Professor Colin Gavaghan

Colin Gavaghan is a Professor at Bristol Digital Futures Institute and at the Law School at the University of Bristol. His research interests include the analysis of legal, ethical and policy issues around new technologies, as well as medical and criminal law. He has published widely on end-of-life issues and was an expert witness in Seales v Attorney General, the leading New Zealand case on assisted dying. Formerly the first Director of the New Zealand Law Foundation Centre for Law and Policy in Emerging Technologies at the University of Otago, he was also Deputy Chair of the New Zealand’s statutory Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Colin Gavaghan

Hansard Society

Parliament

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

[00:00:00] Speaker: You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production, supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk.

[00:00:17] Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

[00:00:24] Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy and welcome to the latest in our special series of mini podcasts tracing the progress of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, the bill that aims to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales.

[00:00:37] In a moment we'll be looking at events in a jurisdiction that's had an assisted dying system for three years, New Zealand, and the lessons it might have for the system in this country. But first Ruth, there's been quite a lot of interesting action in the bill committee that's ploughing through the details of the bill at the moment.

[00:00:52] Ruth Fox: Yes, I mean the pace has quickened a bit. Notably, there have been various comments at different stages from Kim Leadbeater and others keeping an eye on the clock, almost, you know, noting that we need to make progress and so on. And I think they have made a little bit more progress than previous weeks.

[00:01:09] They're getting through things a little bit quicker, partly because it does appear as if some of the MPs who are supportive of the bill are making fewer interventions or shorter interventions. possibly to keep things moving along at a quicker pace.

[00:01:22] Mark D'Arcy: And that's a fairly classic kind of thing that happens when time is running short.

[00:01:27] The supporters of a proposition often almost disengage, let the other side make its debating points, but don't fire back at anything like the normal rate, just so that they don't take up time. It's something you often see, for example, in debates in the Commons Chamber on Private Members Bills.

[00:01:44] Ruth Fox: Yeah, I mean, it's important to stress this bill is getting more scrutiny than any recent Private Member's Bill, I can recall. And actually more scrutiny than quite a lot of Government bills, I can recall as well. So when we talk about the pressure of time and running short of time and so on, that has to be set in context. There's nothing that unusual about where we are in terms of the amount of time.

[00:02:04] But there is this pressure, obviously, of needing to meet the Friday of 25th of April to get into the next stage, Report Stage. put the bill back into the Chamber. They're mindful of that.

[00:02:16] Mark D'Arcy: And that might, for example, entail them sitting rather later than usual in the committee. Some very long sittings, 8pm or 9pm finishes to their afternoon sittings, for example.

[00:02:26] Which can get pretty gruelling for members of the committee who can be there, you know, 4, 5, 6 hours.

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Blog / Once again, there is still no alternative: the costed proposals for Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster

The Restoration and Renewal Client Board’s latest report once again confirms what Parliament has known for nearly a decade: the cheapest, quickest and safest way to restore the Palace of Westminster is for MPs and Peers to move out during the works. The “full decant” option was endorsed in 2018 and reaffirmed repeatedly since. Remaining in the building could more than double costs, extend works into the 2080s, and increase risks to safety, accessibility and security. With the Palace already deteriorating and millions spent each year on patchwork repairs, further delay would itself be an expensive course of action, one that defers decisions without offering a viable alternative.

07 Feb 2026
Read more

News / A Humble Address: How MPs confronted the Mandelson scandal - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 130

It has been a bruising week for the Prime Minister after the House of Commons backed a Conservative “Humble Address” demanding documents on Sir Keir Starmer’s vetting of Lord Mandelson for the Washington Ambassadorship. We explain how the procedure works, what role the Intelligence and Security Committee may play in decisions on disclosure, and how legislation to strip a peerage could be introduced. Plus, the latest on the Restoration and Renewal of Parliament as yet another report lands with a new set of costings. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

06 Feb 2026
Read more

News / Why MPs can’t just quit: The curious case of the Chiltern Hundreds - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 129

Why can’t MPs simply resign, and why does leaving the House of Commons still involve a medieval-sounding detour via the Chiltern Hundreds or its less glamorous cousin the Manor of Northstead? This week we unravel the history, constitutional logic and legal fudges behind this curious workaround, with some memorable resignations from the past along the way. We also assess the Government’s legislative programme as the Session heads toward its expected May close, including the striking lack of bills published for pre-legislative scrutiny. Finally, as Parliament begins the five-yearly process of renewing consent for the UK’s armed forces, we examine why an Armed Forces Bill is required and hear from Jayne Kirkham MP on how her Ten Minute Rule Bill helped extend the new Armed Forces Commissioner’s oversight to the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

01 Feb 2026
Read more

News / Assisted dying bill: How could the Parliament Act be used? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 128

As the assisted dying bill grinds through the House of Lords under the weight of more than a thousand amendments, Lord Falconer has signalled that time is running out. With the Bill unlikely to complete its Lords stages this Session, he has openly raised the possibility of using the Parliament Act to override the upper House in the next Session. In this episode we explore what that would mean, how it could work in practice, and the political choices now facing ministers and Parliament. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

30 Jan 2026
Read more

News / Who really sets MPs’ pay – And why you might be wrong about it. A conversation with Richard Lloyd, chair of IPSA - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 126

What are MPs actually paid and what does the public fund to help them do their job? In this conversation with Richard Lloyd, chair of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) we explore the delicate balance between supporting MPs to do their jobs effectively and enforcing strict standards on the use of public money. We discuss how IPSA has shifted from a rule-heavy “traffic cop” to a principles-based regulator, why compliance is now very high, and the security risks and pressures facing MPs‘ offices as workloads rise and abuse becomes more common. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | ACAST | YouTube | Other apps | RSS

21 Jan 2026
Read more