How a British student has schooled the US Congress

News

How a British student has schooled the US Congress - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 58

4 Dec 2024

In this special episode, we dive into the fascinating world of US congressional procedure with Hansard Society member Kacper Surdy, the once-anonymous force behind the influential social media account @ringwiss. Despite being a 20-year-old Durham University student, Kacper has become a go-to authority on Capitol Hill’s intricate rules, earning the admiration of seasoned political insiders. With Donald Trump hinting at bypassing Senate norms to appoint controversial figures to his cabinet, Kacper unravels the high stakes procedural battles shaping Washington.

LISTEN

Ruth and Mark sat down with Kacper Surdy to explore the remarkable story of how a British student became a trusted commentator on US congressional workings—all without setting foot in Washington, DC. Kacper reveals how his fascination with the 2020 presidential election led him to explore and master the inner workings of the House and Senate. From maintaining a hobbyist’s passion for procedural rabbit holes to fielding inquiries from Capitol Hill insiders, Kacper reflects on his future plans for this unexpected, niche expertise.

He explains the key differences and historical connections between British parliamentary traditions and US congressional rules, offering insights into the House’s meticulous documentation of precedents versus the Senate’s more informal approach. He also explores the potential impact of recess appointments on the balance of power in Washington, decoding the controversial practice that Trump has hinted at using to bypass Senate scrutiny, its historical origins and why it’s a constitutional flashpoint today.

NOTE: This episode was recorded just before Matt Gaetz, Trump’s nominee to be Attorney General, announced he was withdrawing from the post. We’ve left the discussion about this in the recording because it may be relevant to consideration of other nominations in the future.

← Back to Parliament Matters homepage

Listen on our YouTube channel (captioned)

Our guest

Kacper Surdy (@ringwiss)

Kacper Surdy is the political and procedural commentator behind the once-anonymous but highly influential social media account @ringwiss. His online commentary focuses primarily on procedures, precedents and practices in the US Congress, often providing advice and insight into complex procedural matters to journalists and parliamentarians on Capitol Hill. He also occasionally comments on parliamentary procedure in the UK. Since his identity was revealed he has been the subject of profile pieces by both Politico and The Times. Kacper is an undergraduate at Durham University studying for an economics degree and he is a member of the Hansard Society.

Transcript

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There are consequently minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production, supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. In this special episode, we talk to someone who's become a veritable oracle of parliamentary procedure. Not at Westminster, but in Washington. A few years ago an anonymous Twitter feed called @Ringwiss began to comment authoritatively on the work of the U.S. Congress. So good was it that people assumed the person behind it was some veteran congressional staffer informed by decades of experience on Capitol Hill.

Ruth Fox: But no, eventually @ringwiss was revealed to be the product of a 20 year old Durham University student, Kacper Surdy, who also happens to be a Hansard Society member.

With [00:01:00] Donald Trump seeking to bypass the normal procedures to make a series of controversial appointments to his cabinet, we thought we'd talk to Kacper about how it might work and what's at stake. But first, we asked him how he got into this unlikely role as an authoritative commentator on the US Congress.

Kacper Surdy: I really got into the 2020 presidential election. Like many people in the UK, I followed that with some closeness. And after that, I just thought to myself, why don't I take a look at Congress as well? So I started watching the organisation of the House of Representatives and the Senate in January of 2021.

And I was just fascinated by everything that was going on. All the little procedural things that they had to get done, processes that they had to go through.

Ruth Fox: Have you ever been to Washington? Or have you done it all remotely down watching it on C SPAN or something?

Kacper Surdy: Exactly. It's amazing what you can learn from so far away. But hopefully, trip there in the not too distant future. I'd be terrified to [00:02:00] count up how much of my week this takes up, but I do enjoy it. So, in terms of doing it as a hobby, it's absolutely not a problem for me. I love doing it. And, if we get more procedural curiosities for me to look at in the next Congress, it would be great if it does take up more of my time. To be honest. And, I've just never stopped watching.

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Apple

YouTube Podcasts

Spotify

More ways to subscribe

Parliament Matters homepage

Latest / Highlights

News / What happens when you lose the party whip? A conversation with Neil Duncan-Jordan MP - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 131

Labour MP Neil Duncan-Jordan reflects on rebelling against the whip and calling for Keir Starmer to resign, as we assess the fallout from the Mandelson–Epstein affair and its implications for the Government’s legislative programme and House of Lords reform. We examine Gordon Brown’s sweeping standards proposals, question whether they would restore public trust, revisit tensions over the assisted dying bill in the Lord and discuss two key Procedure Committee reports on Commons debates and internal elections. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

Blog / Once again, there is still no alternative: the costed proposals for Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster

The Restoration and Renewal Client Board’s latest report once again confirms what Parliament has known for nearly a decade: the cheapest, quickest and safest way to restore the Palace of Westminster is for MPs and Peers to move out during the works. The “full decant” option was endorsed in 2018 and reaffirmed repeatedly since. Remaining in the building could more than double costs, extend works into the 2080s, and increase risks to safety, accessibility and security. With the Palace already deteriorating and millions spent each year on patchwork repairs, further delay would itself be an expensive course of action, one that defers decisions without offering a viable alternative.

News / Are UK elections under threat? A conversation with the chair of the Electoral Commission, John Pullinger - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 123

With the Government investigating allegations of foreign influence in British politics, we are joined by John Pullinger, Chair of the Electoral Commission, to take stock of the health and resilience of the UK’s electoral system. Our discussion ranges widely over the pressures facing elections and campaigning today, and what issues Parliament may need to grapple with in a future elections bill.

News / Is being Prime Minister an impossible job? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 121

Why do UK Prime Ministers seem to burn out so quickly? We are joined by historian Robert Saunders to examine why the role has become so punishing in recent years. From Brexit and COVID to fractured parties, rigid governing conventions and relentless media scrutiny, the discussion explores what has gone wrong – and what kind of leadership and political culture might be needed to make the job survivable again.

News / Why MPs can’t just quit: The curious case of the Chiltern Hundreds - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 129

Why can’t MPs simply resign, and why does leaving the House of Commons still involve a medieval-sounding detour via the Chiltern Hundreds or its less glamorous cousin the Manor of Northstead? This week we unravel the history, constitutional logic and legal fudges behind this curious workaround, with some memorable resignations from the past along the way. We also assess the Government’s legislative programme as the Session heads toward its expected May close, including the striking lack of bills published for pre-legislative scrutiny. Finally, as Parliament begins the five-yearly process of renewing consent for the UK’s armed forces, we examine why an Armed Forces Bill is required and hear from Jayne Kirkham MP on how her Ten Minute Rule Bill helped extend the new Armed Forces Commissioner’s oversight to the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS