News

Parliament vs. Prince Andrew - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 111

24 Oct 2025
© Wikimedia Commons
© Wikimedia Commons

This week, we explore how far Parliament can go in holding members of the Royal Family to account, as pressure grows for MPs to scrutinise Prince Andrew’s finances and royal titles. We ask whether Nigel Farage should get a right of reply at Prime Minister’s Questions amid his growing prominence, and examine Labour’s reshuffle of select committee posts and calls for greater transparency in how they’re filled. Plus, a look back at the rebuilding of the House of Commons Chamber, 75 years after its postwar reopening.

Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

Normally Parliament steers clear of discussing the Royal Family but with Prince Andrew embroiled in the scandal around the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, there are increasing calls for MPs to act. Could he be called before a select committee to explain his finances and the arrangements around his Royal Lodge home in Windsor Great Park? Might Parliament legislate to strip him of his titles and his role as a Counsellor of State? Could he be removed from the line of succession to the Throne? To explore these issues Ruth and Mark are joined by Dr Craig Prescott of Royal Holloway, University of London, an expert on the modern monarchy.

With other party leaders increasingly using Prime Minister’s Question Time to take potshots at Nigel Farage, does the Reform UK party leader deserve some kind of right of reply during PMQs? The problem is that while he may have a commanding lead in the opinion polls, he leads a tiny contingent of MPs so giving him a regular slot, ahead of other parties with as many, or even more MPs could create more problems than it solves. But as Ruth and Mark discuss, he does have other options for hitting back at his critics.

There’s also movement on the select committee corridor as Labour MPs elect new members to fill vacancies left by those promoted in the recent government reshuffle. But questions remain about the process itself. Should there be greater transparency around how parties decide who sits on these influential committees? We weigh the calls for reform against the realities of party politics behind the scenes.

Finally, this month marks 75 years since the Commons Chamber re-opened after being destroyed in the Blitz. We speak to Dr Eloise Donnelly, Curator of Parliament’s Historic Furniture and Decorative Art, about how the reconstruction balanced modernisation with tradition under the direction of architect Giles Gilbert Scott. From a 15-year-old apprentice carving the Speaker’s Chair to German prisoners of war quarrying the stone, the story of the rebuild is one of craftsmanship, controversy and continuity.

At the heart of a new exhibition marking the anniversary is a remarkable architectural scale model of the postwar Chamber — built in 1944 to help MPs visualise the design, exhibited across the country, lost for decades, but then rediscovered in Parliament. As Ruth reveals, this long-missing model solves a small but fascinating mystery in the Hansard Society’s own history.

Dr Craig Prescott. ©

Dr Craig Prescott

Dr Craig Prescott

Craig is a specialist in UK Constitutional Law, primarily focusing on the constitutional and political role of the monarchy, Parliament and constitutional reform. His latest book, Modern Monarchy, will be published by Agenda Publishing. Craig frequently appears in the media to discuss royal, constitutional, and political matters. He was part of the BBC team that covered the Coronation of Charles III. He has appeared in all the national newspapers in the UK, as well as BBC, SKY, and key outlets in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Brazil, and the United States. He is also interested in Sports Law and has taught this subject at several institutions.

©

Dr Eloise Donnelly

Dr Eloise Donnelly

Eloise is Curator of Historic Furniture and Decorative Art at the Houses of Parliament. She curates a collection of 11,000 objects dating from the 17th century to the 1990s, many of which are still in use on the parliamentary estate today. Prior to joining Parliament in 2023 she was a curator of 19th century metalwork and ceramics at the V&A Museum, and has a PhD from the University of Cambridge on the art market and growth of museum collections in the 19th century.

How the House of Commons Chamber was rebuilt after the Second World War:

Parliament and Prince Andrew

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters. A Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up this week.

Ruth Fox: What, if anything, can Parliament do about Prince Andrew?

Mark D'Arcy: Is PMQs unfair to Nigel Farage?

Ruth Fox: And 75 years after the bombed out Chamber of the House of Commons was restored, the tangled tale of what happened to the architect's model of the new look home for MPs, which is now back on display in Parliament.

Mark D'Arcy: But first Parliament normally tiptoes around the royals, but the [00:01:00] case of Prince Andrew seems to have overridden their normal discretion.

Ruth Fox: Fresh revelations in the last week about Prince Andrew's alleged links with convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, are changing the terms of engagement. There's a bill to strip him of his titles from the MP for York, Rachael Maskell.

There's talk of a Public Accounts Committee inquiry into the lease he has with the Crown Estate for his home at Royal Lodge and Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey used Prime Minister's Questions this week to suggest that the Prince himself should be summoned before a select committee to give evidence.

Mark D'Arcy: But how realistic is any of this? What can Parliament do about Prince Andrew? We turn to Dr. Craig Prescott of Royal Holloway University of London, who's an expert on the constitutional and political aspects of the Royal Family and who's currently writing a book about the modern monarchy. And I began by asking him about the traditional restrictions Parliament has on debating the actions of the royals.

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Blog / Once again, there is still no alternative: the costed proposals for Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster

The Restoration and Renewal Client Board’s latest report once again confirms what Parliament has known for nearly a decade: the cheapest, quickest and safest way to restore the Palace of Westminster is for MPs and Peers to move out during the works. The “full decant” option was endorsed in 2018 and reaffirmed repeatedly since. Remaining in the building could more than double costs, extend works into the 2080s, and increase risks to safety, accessibility and security. With the Palace already deteriorating and millions spent each year on patchwork repairs, further delay would itself be an expensive course of action, one that defers decisions without offering a viable alternative.

07 Feb 2026
Read more

News / A Humble Address: How MPs confronted the Mandelson scandal - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 130

It has been a bruising week for the Prime Minister after the House of Commons backed a Conservative “Humble Address” demanding documents on Sir Keir Starmer’s vetting of Lord Mandelson for the Washington Ambassadorship. We explain how the procedure works, what role the Intelligence and Security Committee may play in decisions on disclosure, and how legislation to strip a peerage could be introduced. Plus, the latest on the Restoration and Renewal of Parliament as yet another report lands with a new set of costings. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

06 Feb 2026
Read more

News / Why MPs can’t just quit: The curious case of the Chiltern Hundreds - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 129

Why can’t MPs simply resign, and why does leaving the House of Commons still involve a medieval-sounding detour via the Chiltern Hundreds or its less glamorous cousin the Manor of Northstead? This week we unravel the history, constitutional logic and legal fudges behind this curious workaround, with some memorable resignations from the past along the way. We also assess the Government’s legislative programme as the Session heads toward its expected May close, including the striking lack of bills published for pre-legislative scrutiny. Finally, as Parliament begins the five-yearly process of renewing consent for the UK’s armed forces, we examine why an Armed Forces Bill is required and hear from Jayne Kirkham MP on how her Ten Minute Rule Bill helped extend the new Armed Forces Commissioner’s oversight to the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

01 Feb 2026
Read more

News / Assisted dying bill: How could the Parliament Act be used? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 128

As the assisted dying bill grinds through the House of Lords under the weight of more than a thousand amendments, Lord Falconer has signalled that time is running out. With the Bill unlikely to complete its Lords stages this Session, he has openly raised the possibility of using the Parliament Act to override the upper House in the next Session. In this episode we explore what that would mean, how it could work in practice, and the political choices now facing ministers and Parliament. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

30 Jan 2026
Read more

News / Who really sets MPs’ pay – And why you might be wrong about it. A conversation with Richard Lloyd, chair of IPSA - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 126

What are MPs actually paid and what does the public fund to help them do their job? In this conversation with Richard Lloyd, chair of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) we explore the delicate balance between supporting MPs to do their jobs effectively and enforcing strict standards on the use of public money. We discuss how IPSA has shifted from a rule-heavy “traffic cop” to a principles-based regulator, why compliance is now very high, and the security risks and pressures facing MPs‘ offices as workloads rise and abuse becomes more common. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | ACAST | YouTube | Other apps | RSS

21 Jan 2026
Read more