What decision the Speaker makes in respect of the grouping of amendments will thus have implications for the structure and focus of the debate and the amount of time that is consumed in divisions rather than discussion. A single, large group of amendments often results in a wide-ranging, repetitive debate that lacks focus and structure. However, multiple groups of amendments, whilst more focused in debate, requires more time for divisions.
To bring a debate on a group of amendments to a close, an MP must move a “closure” motion, that “the question be now put”. Only if that closure motion is agreed – with both a majority vote and more than 100 MPs voting in the affirmative – can the main question on the substantive provision – the new clause or amendment – be put. The Chair (the Speaker or one of the Deputy Speakers) will only allow a closure motion to be put to the House if (s)he deems that the provisions being debated have been adequately discussed. If the Speaker creates only one group of amendments, then only one closure motion will be needed to bring debate to a close and move onto a vote on the lead amendment. But if the Speaker creates multiple groups of amendments, then a separate closure motion will be needed to bring debate on each group to an end in order to proceed to the vote. This would mean more time spent on divisions during the sitting.
If debate on all the groups of amendments – whether on a single group or multiple groups – is not concluded, and a decision in respect of each has not been reached before 14:30, then the debate will be adjourned to resume on a future day, most likely the next available sitting Friday for consideration of Private Members’ Bills, namely 13 June. However, as new Report Stages have precedence over adjourned Report Stages, there is a risk that this assisted dying bill could be leapfrogged by other Private Members’ Bills, hitherto behind it in the queue, but which have finished their Committee Stage before 13 June and now await their Report Stage.
Conversely, if Report Stage does conclude today, then the Bill will move onto the next stage, namely Third Reading, where MPs will be asked to decide whether they are content with the Bill as amended and wish it to be sent to the House of Lords for consideration by Peers. Third Reading is usually a short, cursory stage but that is not expected to be the case for this Bill. It is likely that Third Reading of this Bill will be a more in-depth debate than normal and require a full Friday sitting, akin to the Second Reading debate. Third Reading could be dealt with at the end of Report Stage today, but given that another closure motion to bring the debate to an end would be needed, it is unlikely to be accepted by the Chair if there has been only a short, cursory debate prior to the 14:30 cut off for the sitting. The expectation is therefore that Third Reading will take place on 13 June, when it would have priority over all other PMBs.
At 14:30, any other Private Members’ Bills on the Order Paper awaiting Second Reading will be given a Second Reading providing that they are unopposed. If any MP shouts “Object!” then the MP responsible for the Bill must name a future day for Second Reading. Usually, a Government Whip will object to any PMBs that the Government does not support. In the absence of any objection, Bills may be given a Second Reading and proceed to the next stage with little or no debate.
The Hansard Society’s guide to Private Members’ Bills explains in more detail the various types of PMBs and how the legislative process for PMBs differs from that for Government Bills. You can also listen to our special Parliament Matters podcast series focused on the assisted dying bill – we have discussed the Bill and the changes made to it with several members of the Public Bill Committee, both those who support and oppose the Bill; we discuss the procedural complexities of the PMB process with former House of Commons clerk, Paul Evans; and in our last few episodes we discuss some of the core changes made to the Bill and discuss next steps with the Bill’s sponsor, Kim Leadbeater.
Adjournment: The Labour MP Navendu Mishra has the adjournment debate on the condition of Stockport railway station.